2026 ImpeachmentTracker tracks claims made in the impeachment trial and the evidence cited for them. Status labels describe the state of evidence in the proceeding — never guilt, innocence, or a predicted verdict. This is an independent, solo-developer civic project; corrections are welcome. Read our methodology & disclaimers.

2026 ImpeachmentTracker
All claimsFactual claim
Unverified” means:The claim has been made, but the evidence currently on the public record is not yet sufficient to assess it either way.as of

Why this status: The claim has been made, but the evidence currently on the public record is not yet sufficient to assess it either way.

What does the record show about the NBI Director's testimony that the Vice President's public admission by itself constitutes betrayal of public trust?

NBI chief: admission itself is betrayal of public trust

NBI Director Melvin Matibag, testifying as the prosecution's final witness for Article IV, stated that the Vice President's public admission that she had spoken to someone to kill President Marcos itself constitutes betrayal of public trust, and that the NBI's ongoing investigation is not needed to substantiate the impeachment case because the public admission already established it. The defense moved to strike the testimony as a conclusion of fact and law; the presiding officer denied the motion, ruling Matibag was qualified to give the interpretative answer.

Claimed by Melvin Matibag — Director, National Bureau of Investigation (Witness)

Last updated:

ShareFacebookX

Positions

Witness statement

Witness

NBI Director Melvin Matibag, testifying as the prosecution's final witness for Article IV, stated that the Vice President's public admission that she had spoken to someone to kill President Marcos itself constitutes betrayal of public trust, and that the NBI's ongoing investigation is not needed to substantiate the impeachment case because the public admission already established it. The defense moved to strike the testimony as a conclusion of fact and law; the presiding officer denied the motion, ruling Matibag was qualified to give the interpretative answer.

Source-linked

The witness testified that VP Sara publicly admitted to contracting an assassin to kill the President, and that this admission itself constitutes betrayal of public trust.
Evidence tiers, explained
Tier 1

The official record of the proceeding itself: session video (VODs) and transcripts, filed pleadings, court orders and rulings, admitted exhibits.

Tier 2

An official or primary document from outside the proceeding: an agency report (e.g. a COA audit), an official order or gazette entry, an authenticated original statement.

Tier 3

Reporting that describes primary material rather than being it — one step removed from the record, whoever the publisher is.

Tier 4

Commentary, analysis, or opinion: an editorial, column, press release, social-media post, or other advocacy or self-published take.

Tier 5

A publicly circulating claim whose provenance cannot be traced to any of the tiers above; never used to set a claim's status.