2026 ImpeachmentTracker tracks claims made in the impeachment trial and the evidence cited for them. Status labels describe the state of evidence in the proceeding — never guilt, innocence, or a predicted verdict. This is an independent, solo-developer civic project; corrections are welcome. Read our methodology & disclaimers.

2026 ImpeachmentTracker
All sessions
Published recap

Impeachment Trial - Day 33

Session recap: Impeachment Trial - Day 33 (2026-10-01, 2026-10-01-impeachment-trial-day-33). Covers source-supported material as of 2026-10-07T11:39+08:00, not a complete account.

Last updated:

ShareFacebookX
Transcript status: Machine-cleanedGo to the transcript in SenateHearingTranscripts

Session record

Claims introduced or updated

None published for this session yet.

Evidence & exhibits

  • Session video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdixNI0wjqk
  • Canonical transcript: https://hearings.pinoysagainstcorruption.com/sessions/2026-10-01-impeachment-trial-day-33
  • Amlc witness scheduling
  • The presiding officer stated that the court will issue subpoenas to the respective banks and insurance companies today and that no witness will be available tomorrow, with witnesses expected Monday.
  • Baldonado witness qualification
  • The witness testified that she received a subpoena requiring her to appear as a witness and bring documents, specifically a certified true copy and three USB drives of documents in her custody.
  • The witness testified that she is present because she received a subpoena.
  • Day33 witness lineup manifestation
  • The prosecution panel manifested that it will present two LRA witnesses in the morning and the AMLC Executive Director in the afternoon.
  • The prosecution stated that its pending subpoena request is for representatives of banks and insurance companies to testify next week.
  • The defense counsel stated that the defense confirmed receipt of the prosecution's subpoena request the previous night at 8:40 p.m.
  • Pineda witness qualification
  • The witness testified that he received a subpoena from the impeachment court requiring him to submit all documents pertaining to a certain title, which he brought and submitted to the Clerk of Court.
  • The prosecution objected to use of the tax declaration on the ground that it was not among the documents presented by the witness and was never identified or authenticated by any witness.
  • The defense argued that cross-examination covers any relevant matter and that, since the witness identified a TCT, she may be confronted with documents related to that title.
  • Baldonado exhibit handling
  • The witness testified that she brought a certified true copy of Transfer Certificate of Title No. 146-2024-010775, the deed of sale, real property tax clearance, official receipt of transfer tax, certification of tax on transfer of real property ownership, tax declarations for the land and building, the eCAR, and the cancelled title from which TCT No. 146-2024-010775 was derived.
  • The witness testified that a certified true copy can be identified by special paper, security features exclusive to the Land Registration Authority, QR codes, a serial number and barcode, and watermarks.
  • Prosecution drops trillanes witness
  • The prosecution manifested that it has decided not to present former Senator Sonny Trillanes as a witness.
  • The prosecution manifested that it will no longer present former Senator Trillanes as a witness, effectively dropping him from its witness list.
  • Prosecution sets witness calendar

Court rulings

  • Senator Judge Sotto stated he has strong reservations about postponing the afternoon's proceedings because the prosecution and defense have had the AMLC-related issues since July.
  • A senator-judge stated that the AMLC confidentiality issue was already resolved by oral arguments in July and should not be relitigated.
  • Matina crossing judicial notice dispute
  • The defense asked the court to take mandatory judicial notice that Matina Crossing is officially known as Barangay 74-A in Davao City.
  • The defense manifested that the impeachment court can take mandatory judicial notice of Philippine geographical divisions, particularly that Matina Crossing is officially known as Barangay 74-A.
  • The prosecution countered that Matina is a general area comprising several barangays.
  • Tax declaration cross examination ruling
  • The presiding officer ruled that the tax declaration was a proper subject for cross-examination and allowed the witness to be confronted with the document.
  • Judicial notice facebook page request
  • The presiding officer directed the Clerk of Court to examine the Facebook page in order to decide on counsel's request for judicial notice.
  • The prosecution stated its order of presentation: continuation of the AMLC Executive Director on October 2, BIR on October 5, and bank and insurance company representatives on October 6.

Open questions

    Claims updated in this session

    No structured claim developments have been published for this session yet.