2026 ImpeachmentTracker tracks claims made in the impeachment trial and the evidence cited for them. Status labels describe the state of evidence in the proceeding — never guilt, innocence, or a predicted verdict. This is an independent, solo-developer civic project; corrections are welcome. Read our methodology & disclaimers.

2026 ImpeachmentTracker
All articles
Article I

Misuse of Confidential Funds (OVP and DepEd)

P612.5M total (P500M OVP + P112.5M DepEd)

The Articles allege systematic misuse, misappropriation, and irregular disbursement of confidential funds amounting to P500 million at the Office of the Vice President and P112.5 million at the Department of Education during VP Duterte's tenure at both agencies.

Last updated:

Culpable violation of the ConstitutionGraft and CorruptionBetrayal of Public Trust

Primary source

Secondary coverage

Claims tracked under Article I

House of Representatives of the Philippines · Prosecution“Contested” means:Both sides have put forward evidence or arguments and the matter is actively disputed. Neither position has been substantiated or rejected by the record as tracked so far.as of
Factual claimArticle I

The ₱612.5M confidential-funds charge

The Articles of Impeachment allege that VP Duterte was responsible for the systematic misuse, misappropriation, and irregular disbursement of P612.5 million in confidential funds combined between the Office of the Vice President (P500M) and the Department of Education (P112.5M).

Best source: House Resolution No. 989 / Committee Report No. 261 / Articles of ImpeachmentTier 1
View full claim →
Commission on Audit (COA) · Institution“Evidence presented” means:Evidence has been formally presented or accepted in the record for this claim (e.g. an official filing, an authenticated recording, or an audit finding). This describes the strength of the paper trail, not a verdict of guilt or innocence.as of
Factual claimArticle I

COA's ₱375M disallowance

The Commission on Audit issued a Notice of Disallowance dated March 31, 2026 holding VP Sara Duterte and three other OVP officials personally liable for P375 million in 2023 confidential-fund disbursements, citing insufficient documentation of claimed intelligence and surveillance activities.

Best source: Official Senate VOD: Trial Day 1, defense response on COA disallowance finalityTier 1
View full claim →
Commission on Audit (COA) · Institution“Evidence presented” means:Evidence has been formally presented or accepted in the record for this claim (e.g. an official filing, an authenticated recording, or an audit finding). This describes the strength of the paper trail, not a verdict of guilt or innocence.as of
Factual claimArticle I

What COA's "clean opinion" does and doesn't cover

COA issued an unmodified ('clean') audit opinion on the OVP's overall financial statements for recent fiscal years even as it separately disallowed specific confidential-fund disbursements for lacking documentation.

Best source: Inquirer: OVP gets unmodified opinion from COA for fiscal year 2024Tier 3
View full claim →