2026 ImpeachmentTracker tracks claims made in the impeachment trial and the evidence cited for them. Status labels describe the state of evidence in the proceeding — never guilt, innocence, or a predicted verdict. This is an independent, solo-developer civic project; corrections are welcome. Read our methodology & disclaimers.

2026 ImpeachmentTracker
All sessions
Published recap

Impeachment Trial - Day 4

On Day 4, an NBI investigator testified about the bureau's grave-threats investigation into the Vice President's November 2024 statements, while defense counsel challenged the investigation's documents on dates, signatures, and a DOJ finding of insufficiency. The presiding officer scheduled oral arguments for Wednesday on requested subpoenas for bank, AMLC, and BIR records. Senator-judges also pressed both sides on the wording of the alleged threat and on whether the Vice President's Answer specifically denied the contracting allegation.

Last updated:

ShareFacebookX
Transcript status: Machine-cleanedGo to the transcript in SenateHearingTranscripts

Session record

Claims introduced or updated

  • No new standing claim cards were added this session; four existing cards were updated.
  • The Article IV grave-threats charge was updated with an NBI investigator's testimony that the bureau opened its investigation on November 23, 2024 and recommended charges in a February 10, 2025 affidavit, alongside defense challenges to document dates, an unsigned minutes document, a DOJ certification of insufficiency, and the NBI's standing, and senator-judges' questioning of both sides.
  • The unexplained-wealth allegation was updated with the impeachment court's receipt of a memorandum from counsel for the respondents on subpoenas for bank, AMLC, and BIR records, with oral arguments on the requests scheduled for Wednesday.
  • The Supreme Court's one-year-bar ruling card was updated with counsel's statement that a 2025 impeachment complaint against the Vice President was filed on February 5, 2025 and signed by 215 representatives, a filing the testifying witness said he was not familiar with.
  • The defense's bid to dismiss the case was updated with scrutiny of the Vice President's Answer: Senator-Judge Erwin Tulfo said he would check the official records for a specific denial of the contracting allegation, prosecution counsel cited paragraphs 202 and 203 of the Answer on freedom of expression, and defense counsel stated the Answer denied all allegations through both general and specific denials.

Evidence & exhibits

  • An NBI investigator testified on the grave-threats investigation, including a February 10, 2025 affidavit recommending three counts of grave threats and one count of inciting to sedition and concluding the statements were not protected speech under the dangerous tendency rule.
  • Defense counsel cited date discrepancies on the DOJ received stamps, an unsigned minutes-of-meeting document, and a February 5, 2025 DOJ certification finding the complaint insufficient for preliminary investigation; the witness cited a second DOJ certification dated February 14, 2025 finding the referral sufficient.
  • Defense counsel placed on record a specific denial that the Vice President spoke to a hitman.
  • A senator-judge flagged a November 6 subpoena date predating the statements, which the witness described as a typographical error.
  • The impeachment court received a memorandum from counsel for the respondents regarding the issuance of subpoenas for bank records, AMLC records, and BIR records.
  • Prosecution counsel cited paragraphs 202 and 203 of the Vice President's Answer, which counsel dated May 25, 2026, as claiming her statements were an exercise of freedom of expression.

Court rulings

  • The presiding officer announced that the impeachment court had received a memorandum from counsel for the respondents on the subpoena requests for bank, AMLC, and BIR records, and scheduled oral arguments on those requests for Wednesday, to be heard after the testimony of the witnesses.

Open questions

  • How will the impeachment court rule on the requested subpoenas for bank, AMLC, and BIR records after Wednesday's oral arguments?
  • Will the official records show a specific denial of the contracting allegation in the Vice President's Answer, which Senator-Judge Tulfo said he would check?
  • What evidence will the defense present on its 'Operation Romanov' theory, which counsel said will form part of its evidence in chief?
  • How will the record address the stated discrepancy between the NBI affidavit's characterization of the threat as 'conditional' and agents' testimony that it was 'absolute'?

Claims updated in this session