2026 ImpeachmentTracker tracks claims made in the impeachment trial and the evidence cited for them. Status labels describe the state of evidence in the proceeding — never guilt, innocence, or a predicted verdict. This is an independent, solo-developer civic project; corrections are welcome. Read our methodology & disclaimers.

2026 ImpeachmentTracker
Institution

Supreme Court of the Philippines

Judicial body; ruled on the constitutionality of the first impeachment

En banc ruled in G.R. No. 278353 (decided July 25, 2025; denial of motion for reconsideration final January 29, 2026) that the first impeachment complaint against VP Duterte was barred by the Constitution's one-year rule on impeachment proceedings.

Last updated:

Claims attributed to Supreme Court of the Philippines (1)

Institution“Sustained” means:A procedural or legal position was upheld by the relevant body (e.g. a court or the impeachment court). This is a ruling on procedure or law, not on the underlying factual allegations.as of

The Supreme Court's one-year-bar ruling

The Supreme Court ruled with finality that the first impeachment complaints against VP Duterte, transmitted to the Senate on February 5, 2025, were unconstitutional for violating the one-year bar on impeachment proceedings under Article XI, Section 3(5) of the Constitution.

Sessions where their statements were tracked (3)

These are the trial sessions where claims attributed to Supreme Court of the Philippines arose. This is a transitive relationship — it does not imply attendance or participation.

·1 claim(s)

Impeachment Trial - Day 7

·1 claim(s)

Impeachment Trial - Day 6 (oral arguments)

·1 claim(s)

Impeachment Trial - Day 4

Sources