2026 ImpeachmentTracker tracks claims made in the impeachment trial and the evidence cited for them. Status labels describe the state of evidence in the proceeding — never guilt, innocence, or a predicted verdict. This is an independent, solo-developer civic project; corrections are welcome. Read our methodology & disclaimers.

2026 ImpeachmentTracker
All sessions
Published recap

Impeachment Trial - Day 25

The impeachment court limited pre-2022 SALN records to baseline use, and an Ombudsman records custodian read declared net-worth figures covering 2007 to 2025 into the record.

Last updated:

ShareFacebookX
Transcript status: Machine-cleanedGo to the transcript in SenateHearingTranscripts

Session record

Claims introduced or updated

  • Pre-2022 SALNs admitted as baseline only: after the defense objected, the presiding officer allowed 2007-2025 records only as a baseline for evaluating the vice-presidential term, not to add charges for earlier conduct, and the continuing objection was recorded.
  • Declared net-worth figures read into the record: an Ombudsman records custodian read SALNs declaring net worth of 7,250,497 pesos in 2007, 65,308,841 pesos in 2021, and 98,656,131.20 pesos in 2025; the office stores but does not verify filings, and the figures are declared amounts, not findings of unexplained or unlawful wealth.

Evidence & exhibits

  • SALN declarations covering 2007-2025 were read into the record by an Ombudsman records custodian; the figures are declared amounts, and the custodian noted her office stores but does not verify the filings.

Court rulings

  • The presiding officer allowed pre-2022 SALN records only as a baseline for evaluating the vice-presidential term, not to add charges for earlier conduct; the defense's continuing objection was recorded.

Open questions

  • How much weight the baseline distinction will carry for the charges actually tried.
  • The verification limits of stored SALN filings, which the records office stores but does not verify.

Sources